BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS

I recently spent a few days at one of those Getaway campground cabins that sit on top of trailers and had one of those awful travel moments where I didn't know what to read. I finished Who We're Reading When We're Reading Murakami on my Kindle faster than I expected and wasn't really in the mood for the physical books I brought as back ups: Simulacra and Simulation and Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above 1928-1941. The latter I read years ago and still think of as a classic and I will certainly read again at some point, but it was not the thing to read while trying to distract myself from the types of thoughts that usually creep in around the evening time.

I bought Baudrillard's book thinking it might be useful to read something different from what I normally have my nose buried in - but French post-structuralism wasn't the ticket to distraction either. His ideas aren't really difficult to understand and there's some clever lines of thought there- but my reaction to the whole project was "SO WHAT?" It reminds me of Sartre in that I could easily imagine it as a response to some challenge to articulate the most boring response imaginable to a godless universe. It's a dull mental exercise that is meant to distract you and sounds deeper than it actually is. That line of thinking that Sartre's ideas stem from an exhausted post-war France giving up on itself (before the intellectuals got a jolt of energy and took up the dullest type of leftism in the 1960's) is sneered at by his admiring interpreters but it also struck me as hitting pretty close to the truth. Baudrillard (and basically anything that gets tagged with a label that begins with "post-") seems like the physical manifestation of the ennui of a few decades' worth of graduate students not quite smart enough for Sartre.

Or something. I'm not a philosopher I'm just a loser who likes books.

Comments

It Will be Fun and Terrifying

I pretend to be obsessed with Russian history and social movements, but this volume has been sitting on my shelf for the past year and I still haven't gotten through all of it. When I first started reading about 90's Russia, National Bolshevism, and nationalist movements in general this was exactly the sort of book I wished existed and now it does. Some of Adam Curtis' journalism touches on some of the themes here as well, which for me boil down to: Russian politics are so much more interesting than ours. Not to live through ( though from where I live we seem to be inching our way towards a softer version of 90's Russia which might not be totally fair since I live in Buffalo) but as a political environment to study. For all of our fringe political thinkers and movements, nothing outside of the competition between the boring center right and the boring center left has any depth. We don't have intellectuals forming post-modern extremist movements based on self consc...

a double book review

Disenchanged Wanderer: The Apocalyptic Vision of Konstantin Leontiev. by Glen Cronin. Published by Cornell Press. High White Notes: The Rise and Fall of Gonzo Journalism. by David Wills. Published by Beatdom Books. Adventures in Overthinking: Reactionary Russians and the Fall of Gonzo I think you're supposed to read new books occasionally but as some of the poorly constructed paragraphs in the entries below imply, I don't do that very often. I've read two newish books recently, one the Leontiev biography I was losing my mind over a few months back and the second one a biography/literary analysis of Hunter S. Thompson. The latter joins a long list of books that have tackled Thompson but this is the first one I've read in a while that actually seemed necessary for people who like his books and take them seriously. The world doesn't need the 20th memoir by someone who hung out in Thompson's kitchen and thinks they're some kind of insider because they share...

Russian Communists, like Russian Tattoos and Russian Magazines, are Simply Better Than Ours

I've been meaning to write about 15 book reviews on here, mostly so I don't have to force people I know to listen to my opinions on books and people they couldn't possibly care less about. Less ambitiously, here is what I been reading: The three Russian criminal tattoo books put out by Fuel. As I get older I am more and more inclined to buy books that are mostly pictures, and these are the perfect mix of scholarly introductions (not too long and never boring) and photographs about a world I'll never come anywhere near. This world is the antithesis of America's world of "body art", where every provincial has dozens of meaningless ugly tattoos all over themselves. For some reason I think the KPRF and it's history are interesting. Maybe it's because American Communists are just so boring and awful, with a history of either being stooges or (after 1991) generic lefties who think voting for Social Democratic parties is too extreme . I also suspect I am...

Icons and Cockroaches

Search This Blog