Skip to main content

Disenchanted Russian Reactionaries


For the first time in quite a few years I'm impatiently waiting for a book release. It's a rare event for a number of reasons, the primary ones being that most of my reading consists of 1 - biographies and novels that I've read a dozen times before and 2- as many already published books I can find on whatever topic I happen to be obsessed with at the moment (more on that in the future). Well the stars have aligned and a new release is overlapping with a topic that fit into that second category: Russian writer  and the subject of Cornell Press's Disenchanted Wanderer: The Apocalyptic Vision of Konstantin Leontiev.

For anyone interested in the history of Russian conservatism or just Russian culture in general, Leontiev is a refreshing and interesting figure because of his biography and the impossibility of categorizing him according to modern standards. A minor noble born in 1861, he developed an aesthetic approach to life and morality, prioritizing the picturesque over the mundane and frequently viewing non-Russian peoples as being equal to or superior to his own civilization based on his own aesthetic standard. Few people who earn the label "Russian nationalist" would praise the Ottoman Empire and question the wisdom of pan-Slavism but he did. Trained as a doctor he also wrote a few novels, developed a theory of how civilizations develop and decay, and finished his life as a monk, because of course he did.

Unlike some of my other literary/historical obsessions, I don't really remember when I first discovered Leontiev's existence. I vaguely remember reading a Ph.D thesis about him online during my second stint in China, so that would put it after 2015, far too late in life for someone who thought of himself as being well read on the topic of Russian conservatism and philosophy. I probably saw his name on a list of people who influenced someone else I happened to be reading about and then tried to find everything I could about him online (that "someone else" was probably Limonov, a list of his influences makes up about 50% of what I have read in the last five years).

Once I had read about him and began my search for whatever else I could find about his life I didn't find much- until recently. There hasn't really been much available by or about Leontiev in English until not that long ago. The above mentioned Ph.D thesis is available online, as are articles written about his spirituality and blog posts about him. Weybright and Talley published translations of two of his works in the 1960's: Against the Current, selections from his novels and other writings, and The Egyptian Dove, an unfinished novel based on his time as a diplomat in Turkey. Once my obsession with Leontiev kicked into high gear I found used copies of both and that was pretty much as far as it could go until Taxiarch Press published his Byzantinism and Slavdom, where his main historical and philosophical ideas are articulated. Mentioned in that book is Lukashevich's biography, which I also bought immediately despite it interpreting Leontiev through  Freud's theories, something which seems to inhibit rather than assist with understanding him. 

In any event, I'll try to find other topics to keep myself busy until this book comes out. I'm sure I'll finish it within a few days and then reread everything else I own by him.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS

 I recently spent a few days at one of those Getaway campground cabins that sit on top of trailers and had one of those awful travel moments where I didn't know what to read. I finished Who We're Reading When We're Reading Murakami  on my Kindle faster than I expected and wasn't really in the mood for the physical books I brought as back ups:  Simulacra and Simulation  and Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above 1928-1941.  The latter I read years ago and still think of as a classic and I will certainly read again at some point, but it was not the thing to read while trying to distract myself from the types of thoughts that usually creep in around the evening time.  I bought Baudrillard's book thinking it might be useful to read something different from what I normally have my nose buried in - but French post-structuralism wasn't the ticket to distraction either. His ideas aren't really difficult to understand and there's some clever lines of thought ...

Russian Communists, like Russian Tattoos and Russian Magazines, are Simply Better Than Ours

I've been meaning to write about 15 book reviews on here, mostly so I don't have to force people I know to listen to my opinions on books and people they couldn't possibly care less about. Less ambitiously, here is what I been reading: The three Russian criminal tattoo books put out by Fuel. As I get older I am more and more inclined to buy books that are mostly pictures, and these are the perfect mix of scholarly introductions (not too long and never boring) and photographs about a world I'll never come anywhere near. This world is the antithesis of America's world of "body art", where every provincial has dozens of meaningless ugly tattoos all over themselves. For some reason I think the KPRF and it's history are interesting. Maybe it's because American Communists are just so boring and awful, with a history of either being stooges or (after 1991)  generic lefties who think voting for Social Democratic parties is too extreme . I also suspect I am...

Hero Worship and Movies about Russian Nationalists

  Above is the first image I saw from the new Limonov movie. 20 year old me would have been losing his mind over this but (slightly) older me is unsure. It is exciting that it's being made, the first film about his whole life (the Russian made Rosskoe was focused on a young Limonov) BUT: It's not just an adaptation of his life story but of the Carrere book. The fact that it took a book by a French bourgeois memoirist  to get a major movie about Limonov made is ludicrous. Someone should have made one years ago, hell, someone should have done a whole series of them years ago,  one for each of his major phases that a good film maker could create a complete aesthetic universe out of. You'd have Limonov the thief/poet in muddy and drab provincial Ukraine, Limonov roving through Moscow and partying with underground poets, the down and out punk years in violent 70's NYC (plus the fun challenge of casting Richard Hell and the Ramones), his time in Paris with the intellectuals g...